class: left, top, title-slide .title[ # Interactions Part II:
Predation
] .subtitle[ ##
EFB 370: Population Ecology
] .author[ ###
Dr. Elie Gurarie
] .date[ ### April 3, 2023 ] --- ## Competition .... .darkorange[ `$${dN_1 \over dt} = r_1 N \left(1-{N_1 \over K_1} - \alpha {N_2 \over K_1}\right)$$` ] .darkblue[ `$${dN_2 \over dt} = r_2 N \left(1-{N_2 \over K_2} - \beta {N_1 \over K_2}\right)$$` ] is the outcome of 2 density dependent phenomena: 1. Intra-specific competition ($K_1$ and `\(K_2\)`) 2. Inter-specific competition ($\alpha$ and `\(\beta\)`) Patterns depend on the *scale* and *particulars* of the competition intensity. ] --- ## Focus on the the isoclines of zero growth .pull-left[ .darkorange[$$N_2 = {K_1 \over \alpha} - {1\over \alpha} N_1$$] .darkblue[$$N_2 = K_2 - \beta N_1$$] ] .pull-right[ <center> ![](Interactions_PartII_CompetitionAndPredation_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-2-1.png)<!-- --> ] --- ## Extinction vs. Equilibria .pull-left[ If: - `\({1\over\beta} < {K_1 \over K_2} > \alpha\)`; .darkorange[ `\(N_1\)` ] wins - `\({1\over\beta} > {K_1 \over K_2} < \alpha\)`; .darkblue[ `\(N_2\)` ] wins - `\({1\over\beta} < {K_1 \over K_2} < \alpha\)`; .darkorange[ `\(N_1\)` ] or .darkblue[ `\(N_2\)` ] wins - `\({1\over\beta} > {K_1 \over K_2} > \alpha\)`; .darkorange[ `\(N_1\)` ] and .darkblue[ `\(N_2\)` ] coexist Equilibria (stable or not) at: - `\(N^*_1 = {K_1 - \alpha K_2 \over 1-\alpha\beta}\)` - `\(N^*_2 = {K_2 - \beta K_1 \over 1-\alpha\beta}\)` ] .pull-right[ ![](Interactions_PartII_CompetitionAndPredation_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-3-1.png)<!-- --> ] --- ## Co-existence essentially occurs when .... .pull-left[ **Intra**-specific > **Inter**-specific competition `$${1\over\beta} > {K_1 \over K_2} > \alpha$$` `\(\beta\)` and `\(\alpha\)` small, in a very particular way relative to the ratio of carrying capacities. ] .pull-right[ <center> <img src='images/CrissCrossStable.png' width='100%'/> </center> ] --- class: inverse # **Predation** .center[<img src='images/fawn.jpg' width='70%'/>] --- class: inverse ## Predation .pull-left[ ![](images/fawn.jpg) ] .pull-right.large[ an ecological process where one organism (the predator) consumes another (the prey). - Provides most of the principle route of energy flow through ecosystems - Strong selective pressure - **Chief source of density dependent effects** in regulation of many animal (and plant) populations ] --- ## Predation is *any* transfer of energy up a trophic level! .pull-left.large[ - **Herbivory:** animals eat plants - **granivores:** eat grain - **frugivores:** eat fruit - **Parasitism:** animals eat other animals without (immediately) killing them - **Carnivory:** animals eat other animals, killing them - **Cannibalism:** animals eat their conspecifics ] .pull-right[ ### Basic principles (to model) .large[ - Growth in **predator** population depends on the number of **prey** - Growth in **prey** population depends on the number of **predators** - As an extension of competition - An extreme form of competition ] ] --- .pull-left-40[ ![](images/asiaticcheetah.png) ![](images/persianleopard.png) ] .pull-right[ ## Intra-guild predation ![](images/skull.png) ![](images/cheetahleopardtitle.png) ] --- ## Start with competition ... .pull-left-40[ .darkorange[$${dP \over dt} = r_p P \left(1-{P \over K_p} - \alpha {V \over K_p}\right)$$] .darkblue[$${dV \over dt} = r_v V \left(1-{V \over K_v} - \beta {P \over K_v}\right)$$] ] .pull-right-60[ ![](Interactions_PartII_CompetitionAndPredation_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-4-1.png)<!-- --> ] --- ## And ADD some extra terms **Species 1** (competitor AND predator `\(P\)`) benefits: .darkorange[ `$${dP \over dt} = r_p P \left(1-{P \over K_p} - \alpha {V \over K_p}\right) + \gamma VP$$` ] **Species 2** (competitor AND prey `\(V\)`) suffers: .darkblue[ `$${dV \over dt} = r_v V \left(1-{V \over K_v} - \beta { P\over K_v}\right) - \sigma V P$$` ] - `\(\gamma\)` (gamma) = **conversion factor** - how much does predators population benefit from eating prey? - `\(\sigma\)` (sigma) = **capture efficiency** - how much does prey population suffer from getting eaten? --- ## Inspect the isoclines! .pull-left[ `$$P^* = K_p - \left(\alpha - {\gamma K_p \over r_p}\right) V$$` `$$V^* = K_v - \left(\beta + {\sigma K_v \over r_v}\right) P$$` Qualitatively - `\(P\)` isocline slope becomes STEEPER (and y - intercept increases). - `\(V\)` isocline also becomes STEEPER (and x-intercept decreases) ] .pull-right-40[ ![](images/rotatingisoclines.png) ] --- ## Rotating isocline **Equilibrium shifts UP toward the predator `\(K_1\)` and DOWN from prey `\(K_2\)`.** <center> <img src='images/rotating2.png' width = '50%'/> See: https://egurarie.shinyapps.io/isoclines/ <!-- ## Let's toss out competition: {.columns-2} ![](Interactions_PartII_CompetitionAndPredation_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-5-1.png)<!-- --> --> --- ## The Lotka-Volterra Predator-Prey Model That was complicated! Let's simplify RADICALLY and eliminate ALL competition and density dependence: `$$\Large \alpha = \beta = 0; K_v = K_p = \infty$$` .pull-left-40[ .darkorange[$$\large {dP \over dt} = -q P + \gamma VP$$] .darkblue[$$\large {dV \over dt} = r V - \sigma VP$$] ] .pull-right[ **Predators** are always dying at rate `\(q\)`, BUT grow in propotion to **prey**. **Prey** grow exponentially at rate `\(r\)`, BUT die off in proportion to **predator**. ] --- ## Assumptions .large[ Lots! And mainly unrealistic! - Standard continuous modeling stuff: - No age structure - Closed population - No time lag - Instantaneous **Birth** responses of **P** to **V** and **Death** responses to **V** to **P** - **Mass action**: perfect population mixing in proportion to number of individuals **BUT** it's still a fun model to play with - and a good starting point. ] --- .center[ `\(P\)` - predators | `\(V\)` - prey `\(q\)` - mortality rate | `\(\gamma\)` - "conversion" efficiency ] .pull-left[ ### .darkorange[Prey dynamics] .darkorange[ `$$\Large {dV \over dt} = r V - \sigma VP$$`] No density dependence `\(K\)`, No competition `\(\alpha P\)`, only intrinsic growth rate `\(r\)` and removal by `\(P\)` at rate `\(\sigma\)`. - Large `\(\sigma\)` - strong effect: each **moose** killed by each **wolf** has big impact - Small `\(\sigma\)` - weak effect: **bats** and **mosquitoes** ... hard for bats to make an impact. ] -- .pull-right[ ### .darkblue[Predator dynamics] .darkblue[ $$\Large {dP \over dt} = - qP + \gamma VP $$] - Constant mortality; Growth depends entirely on Prey - High `\(\gamma\)`: high dependency on each discrete prey item, e.g. 1 .green[**anaconda**] eats 1 .darkred[**capybara**] - Low `\(\gamma\)`: low dependency on each discrete prey item, e.g. 1 .blue[**blue whale**] eats 1 .red[**krill**]. ] --- ## Obtain equilibria .pull-left[ ### .darkorange[Prey] equilibrium occurs when .darkorange[$$\Large P^* = {r\over \sigma}$$] - Number of predators associated with 0 growth in prey population - ratio of **prey growth** to predator **capture efficiency** - i.e. **inputs**/**outputs** ] .pull-right[ ### .darkblue[Predator] equilibrium occurs when .darkblue[$$\Large V^* = {q\over \gamma}$$] - Number of prey associated with 0 growth in predator population - ratio of predator **death rate** to **conversion** - i.e. **outputs**/**inputs** ] --- .pull-left[ ## Prey Isoclines ] .pull-right[ ## Predator Isoclines <img src="Interactions_PartII_CompetitionAndPredation_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-7-1.png" width="100%" /> ] --- .pull-left[ ## Graphical analysis ![](images/LVtrajectories.png) ] .pull-right[ ## Numerical analysis .center[https://egurarie.shinyapps.io/predatorprey/] ] --- .pull-left[ ## How does this look? - Persistent oscillations with no convergence - 1/4 cycle out of phase - `\(P_{max}\)` and `\(P_{min}\)` occur when `\(V\)` is at median - `\(V_{max}\)` and `\(V_{min}\)` occur when `\(P\)` is at median 2 exceptions: - equilibrium point - extreme starting point ] .pull-right[ ![](images/LVexample2.png) ] --- ## Very famous Snowshoe Hare and Lynx dataset Based (mainly) on fur sales from the Hudson Bay Company in Canada over 100 years. Roughly a 9 to 11 year, fairly synchronous, cycle. .pull-left-60[![](images/hare_lynx.png)] .pull-right-40[ ![](images/harelynx_capture.jpg) ] .center[**But are these really predator prey oscillations!?**] --- ## Are predator prey oscillations real? A theoretical wrinkle ... add *any* carrying capacity to the model: - https://egurarie.shinyapps.io/predatorprey/ - https://egurarie.shinyapps.io/isoclines/ --- ## Are predator prey oscillations real? ... add *any* carrying capacity to the model: ![](images/LVexampleWithCC.png) And we lose all our oscillations! --- .pull-left-70[ ## Are predator prey oscillations real? Back to the very controlled laboratory environment ... ![](images/UnicellularPredation.jpg) *Didinium nausutum* vs. *Paramecium caudatum*. ] .pull-right-30[ ![](images/Gause.jpg) Georgiy Frantsevich Gause </center> ] --- ## First attempt Just put them together and see what happens <img src="Interactions_PartII_CompetitionAndPredation_files/figure-html/gauseR_take1-1.png" width="80%" /> ... **Maybe one oscillation?** --- ## Second attempt Add a little prey refuge which *Didinium* can't reach. **Paramecia hide until all predators die off, then rebound.** <img src="Interactions_PartII_CompetitionAndPredation_files/figure-html/gauseR_take2-1.png" width="80%" /> --- ## Third attempt Dribble in 1 *Paramecium* and 1 *Didinium* into the dish every 3 days. <center> <img src="Interactions_PartII_CompetitionAndPredation_files/figure-html/gauseR_take3-1.png" width="80%" /> </center> **Conclusion:** Oscillations are not intrinsic to predator prey dynamics, but require some local back-and-forth, immigration - emigration, local dynamics. --- .pull-left-60[ ## Are Hare - Lynx Lotka-Volterra? ![](images/hare_lynx.png) ] .pull-right-40[ ### Some quibbles - Lynx peaks *follow* Hare peaks! - Hare also oscillate where there are no Lynx - Peaks are synchronized **across** North America ![](images/harelynx_capture.jpg) ] --- background-image: url("images/StensethBackground.png") background-size: cover ## Maybe it's food-web structure? **Hare** cycle with vegetation (bottom up control) and multi-species predation (top-down control), whereas **Lynx** depend strongly just on hare - which solely drive the cycle. --- background-image: url("images/YanBackground.png") background-size: cover ## Maybe it's climate? .pull-left[ Maybe large scale climate oscillations? (sunspots, NAO) ] --- background-image: url("images/DengBackground.png") background-size: cover .pull-left[ ## Is it the trappers? Why do Lynx lag behind Hare? Maybe the **Hare** eat the **Lynx**? (HEL hypothesis). Or ... if you add trappers themselves to the equation ... you can reshift the cycle. ] --- ## On balance .... .pull-left[ - Lotka-Volterra is a nice, but highly theoretical framework ... just too many unrealistic assumptions. - Like any **null model**, thinking specifically about WHY it breaks down (which is **always**) can lead to real insights. - Predator-prey phase-spaces is a very useful graphical way to understand dynamic systems. - More versatile approaches to predation modeling coming next week... ] .pull-right[ ![](images/harelynx_capture.jpg) ]